Npm browser download to file

Zababa 30 days ago parent prev next [—]. And on the other hand every week I see a few issues about "regex DDOS" for tools that usually go nowhere near user-generated input. All of that creates a very fertile ground to distribute malicious code through NPM. I acknowledge and address that other hand both in the linked issue and this comment thread.

ComputerGuru 30 days ago parent prev next [—]. That takes the lax attitude towards security in the NPM world to a whole new level. Their proposal is just the wrong solution, and last I checked in they were too wedded to it.

I think security at NPM is "done". It's a public repository of stuff. End of story. Why should NPM do the job of vetting everything? They aren't getting paid for it or most of it. JonathanMerklin 29 days ago root parent next [—]. They have paid security staff. This is a job posting for a security engineer at npm from July 4, that appears filled to me. I'm sure as an organization npm inc.

EdwardDiego 30 days ago parent prev next [—]. Wow, there's some very dismissive responses in there - and who calls users "muggles"? Maintainer already released clean versions "on top of" the compromised ones, and NPM acted on reports and removed the compromised versions as well. Compromised and no longer downloadable from NPM : - 0.

Both are blocked by up-to-date Windows Defender and presumably other AV software. We pin all of our npm dependencies and upgrade them via dependabot.

But there's no guarantee that what's on GH matches what is uploaded to npm which is what happened in this case; there are no malicious commits. Does anyone know of a good way to verify that a npm release matches what's on GH? Skip the nonsense and just check your dependencies in directly to your repo. The separation has no real world gains for developers and doesn't serve anyone except the host of your source repo. As it turns out most people's repo host is also the operator of the package registry they're using, so there aren't even theoretical gains for them, either.

I run into this crap all the time to the point that people who claim it isn't a problem I know have to be lying. I don't think that's right.

It may mean you know they are wrong, but wrong! If you have external reasons to believe that the person you're talking to should or does know better, then it's fair to say they are lying. But, in general, if you accuse someone who is simply wrong to be lying , you're going to immediately shut down any productive conversation that you could otherwise have.

Osiris 30 days ago root parent prev next [—]. There is a deprecated project at my work that committed the entire yarn offline cache to the repo.

At least those were gzipped, but the repo still had a copy of every version of every dependency. It isn't a good long term solution unless you really don't care at all about disk space or bandwidth which you may or may not. A middle ground that I've seen deployed is corporate node mirrors with whitelisted modules. Then individual repos can just point to the corporate repo. Same thing for jars, python packages, etc.

And build pipelines that fail due to the size of the repo. You can get reasonable degrees of reproducibility by choosing reasonable tools: Yarn lets you commit their binary and run that in the specified repo regardless of which version you have installed globally. Rush also allows you to enforce package manager versions. Packages themselves are immutable as long as you don't blow away your lockfile.

These days, the non-hermeticity stuff that really grinds my gears is the very low plumbing stuff. I'm hoping someone can come up with some zig-based sanity here. Google famously does this at scale and my understanding is that they had to invest in custom tooling because upgrades and auditing were a nightmare otherwise. We briefly considered it at some point at work too but the version control noise was too much. Ill-advised tool adoption is exactly the problem I'm aiming to get people to wake up and say "no" to.

You need only one version control system, not one reliable one plus one flaky one. Use the reliable one, and stop with the buzzword bandwagon, which is going to be a completely different landscape in 4 years.

This has to be addressed by making it part of the culture, which is where me telling you to commit your dependencies comes from. Assuming the npm registry doesn't dissapear, npm will download the exact same files you would have committed to your repo.

Wherever those files came from, 4 years later you upgraded your OS, and now the install step will fail in my experience usually because of node-gyp. M1 laptops didn't exist 4 years ago. If I'm using an M1 today, how can I stand up this 4 year old app? The real problem is reproducible builds, and that's not something git can solve. If everything is checked in to source control, npm will have nothing to download.

The workflow for devs grabbing a 10 year old project is to check it out then npm start it. If you were to try this in real life, you'd get an error like this one. Download bindings? Now you're right back where you started. But that workflow isn't for me. As I qualified, the issue you're describing was a real pain maybe two or three years ago, but not anymore IME. For context, my day job currently involves project migrations into a monorepo we're talking several hundred packages here and non-reproducibility due to missing lockfiles is just not an issue these days for me.

I'm really struggling to understand the kind of confusion that would be necessary in order for this question to make sense. Why do you suspect that this might be a problem "in [my] organization"? How could it even be? I get the dreadful feeling that despite my saying "[That] means nothing if it's not my project", you're unable to understand the scope of the discussion.

When people caution their loved ones about the risk of being the victim of a drunk driving accident on New Years Eve, it doesn't suffice to say, "I won't drink and drive, so that means I won't be involved a drunk driving accident.

I'm not concerned about projects under my control failing. That's not what we're talking about. I didn't even say anything about lockfiles until you brought it up. You're not seeing the problem, because you're insisting on trying to understand it through a peephole. I mean, of course I'm going to see this from the lenses of my personal experience which is that nasty non-reproducibility issues usually would only happen when someone takes over some internal project that had been sitting in a closet for years and the original owner is no longer at the company.

Stumbling upon reproducibility issues in 4 year old projects on Github is just not something that happens to me and I have contributed to projects where, say, Travis CI had been broken in master branch for node 0. I don't think it's a matter of me having a narrow perspective, but maybe you could enlighten me.

Total Files Last publish 3 years ago. Try on RunKit. Report malware. For undocumented behavior or exposed internals, changes are described in release notes. Detailed release notes for each version are available on GitHub. When using Vue, we recommend also installing the Vue Devtools in your browser, allowing you to inspect and debug your Vue applications in a more user-friendly interface. Simply download and include with a script tag.

Vue will be registered as a global variable. You will miss out on all the nice warnings for common mistakes! For production, we recommend linking to a specific version number and build to avoid unexpected breakage from newer versions:.

You can browse the source of the NPM package at cdn. On the next screen, review the license agreement. Click Next if you agree to the terms and install the software. The installer will prompt you for the installation location. Leave the default location, unless you have a specific need to install it somewhere else — then click Next. The wizard will let you select components to include or remove from the installation.

Again, unless you have a specific need, accept the defaults by clicking Next. Finally, click the Install button to run the installer. When it finishes, click Finish. The system should display the Node. You can do the same for NPM:. The sample package. Remember, if you have an existing package. This merely illustrates a starting point.

Also, the packages listed in devDependencies not their versions are the minimum requirements for rollup to create the three separate builds umd, es, and unpkg mentioned. As newer versions become available, they should be updated as necessary. Our changes to package. This is accomplished by a simple wrapper. That wrapper, in its entirety, looks like this:. Notice the first line directly imports your SFC, and the last line exports it unchanged.

As indicated by the comments in the rest of the code, the wrapper provides an install function for Vue, then attempts to detect Vue and automatically install the component. With the package.